This
is the second post in a series about Charles Williams and the
Fellowship of the Rosy Cross. You can access the others via this
index.
I
learned the Williams information from six sources, and have been
reading around in all kinds of random sources for the Golden
Dawn/Rosicrucian stuff, including dear old wikipedia:
Ashenden,
Gavin. Charles
Williams: Alchemy and Integration.
Kent State University Press, 2007. Print.
Brewer,
Elisabeth. “Charles
Williams and Arthur Edward Waite.” Seven
vol. 4 (1983).
54-67.
Dunning,
Stephen M. The
Crisis and the Quest: A
Kierkegaardian Reading of Charles Williams.
Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster Press, 2000. Print.
King,
Roma A. Jr. The
Pattern in the Web: The Mythical Poetry of Charles Williams.
Kent State University Press, 1900. Print.
Willard,
Thomas. "Acts of the Companions: A. E. Waite's Fellowship and
the Novels of Charles Williams." academia.edu. Web.
I
strongly recommend all of these works. Each covers different material
and they are quite complimentary.
Ashenden's
focuses on the long history of hermeticism, especially alchemy as a
spiritual practice, then relates this to Williams. It is learned and
comprehensive.
Cavaliero's
is a more specific study of Williams and takes a positive approach to
his Christianity. It is an excellent study of the Arthurian poetry.
Dunning's
quite obviously originated as a dissertation, and is sometimes a bit
forced in its comparisons of Williams and Kierkegaard. However, it is
an intelligent philosophical study of one of the most important
themes in Williams's writing: his use of a particular “Crisis of
Schism” as a form of literary theory. Dunning's argument turns on a
Kierkegaardian distinction between religions of Transcendence (in
which God is separate from His creation) and Immanence (in which God
dwells in people to some extent): Christianity, so Dunning argues
that Kierkegaard believed, must be only the former; occult religions
are the latter, and to the extent that Williams was an occultist, so
far his beliefs were contrary to Christian truth. I have a bit more
work to do to wrap my head around all the details of this argument
and to fully understand this book—and discover whether or not I
think it is a correct reading of Williams. In any case, it has an
excellent appendix on Williams and Waite.
Gilbert's
book is a disorganized, non-chronological, confusing biography of
A.E. Waite (Williams's occult mentor). But it's the only bio of Waite
I know about, and has a very useful chapter on Williams and Waite.
King's
I haven't yet read all the way through, but it's an excellent poetic
study and has a very helpful section on Williams and the Rosy Cross.
No comments:
Post a Comment