I have written a little review of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug; it is published here, on Curator. In this article, I also summarize my experience at The Tolkien Professor's conference this past weekend, called "Mythmoot II."
You may also be interested these articles I wrote last year:
"Packing for an Unexpected Journey"
"Embellishment is an Understatement"
"Showing Us Our Inconsistent Selves"
or these lectures:
"Where is The Hobbit? Tolkien's Fantastical Geography"
"J.R.R. Tolkien, Myth-Maker"
Though each day may be dull or stormy, works of art are islands of joy. Nature and poetry evoke "Sehnsucht," that longing for Heaven C.S. Lewis described. Here we spend a few minutes enjoying those islands, those moments in the sun.
19 December 2013
27 November 2013
New York C.S. Lewis Society Celebration
New York C.S.
Lewis Society
Since I couldn't afford to go to London this weekend for the installation of Lewis's stone in Poet's Corner of
Westminster Abbey, I went to New York City to
join in the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Lewis's death
with other poor or local scholars and fans. Here are little summaries of or
commentaries on the talks.
Monsignor Hull gave the first introductions of the day, as this event was held in and
partly sponsored by the Sheen Center for Faith and
Culture. This reminds me to mention to you that there is
something of a movement going on right now to wrest Lewis from the American
Evangelicals and argue that if he were alive right now, he would be a Roman
Catholic. This might be something to explore in a later post.
Then James Como
gave further intros. I must say it was an enormous pleasure to meet, greet,
listen to, and talk with all these lovely people and intelligent Lewis
scholars.
During the talks, I sat with the intrepid William O'Flaherty
of Essential C.S. Lewis. He is a walking
Lewis encyclopedia: whenever a speaker referenced a title, text, image, etc. William
pulled it up on his computer quick as thought. That was very cool.
The first speaker
was William Griffin, who wrote the third biography of Lewis and
worked as an editor at Macmillan for many years, helping to bring Lewis’s works
to the United States. He told several delightful stories about his time at
Macmillan.
In 1977, he did some research
and found that 5 million copies of CSL's books had been printed. Macmillan had
fallen short on their sales list and needed a new CSL book overnight. Griffin came
up with the idea of a thematic anthology entitled The Joyful Christian, organized
according to the points of the Nicene Creed. He chose the quotes, organized the
book, and was about to go to press with it when—oops! His senior editor asked
him if he had consulted Walter Hooper about copyright permissions! No, he
hadn’t; who was Hooper? Once enlightened, he sent off a “grovel” asking for
Hooper’s blessing on the new book. Hooper wrote back that the book was “worthy
of a D Phil.” Griffin said, “that made me his slave for life.”
The book was a huge hit; 35,000
copies were ordered in the first two days of its availability. It was the start
of the “blankety-blank Christian” series: The
Joyful Christian, The Visionary Christian, The Electric Christian, etc.—all anthologies from various writers.
Dorothy Sayers and Fulton Sheen were included. Griffin turned down a date with
a movie star to meet Sheen to work on that book.
There
were other stories, other statistics. It would have been a more lively talk had
Griffin just told his stories, rather than reading them out in a monotone.
Perhaps the whole paper will be published somewhere so that others can enjoy
the content of the talk.
Next, Elaine
Tixier read a paper about Till We Have Faces, which she
argues is CSL's best work of fiction. I agree. She focused on themes of doubt
and the stages that lead to faith. Although Lewis wrote that this novel is
about what it would feel like for someone to lose a family member to
Christianity—in other words, about how conversion feels from the outside,
rather than the inside—Tixier talked about the novel as an extended query: Why
do some people see what is hidden to others? Why do some have the gift of
faith, while others do not? Its theme is the mystery of the transmission of
faith. She compared it to The Silver Chair, which is also about the
question Eustace asks Jill: “Are you good at believing things?” He chose to ask
this question in several fictional works, because fairy tale and myth both have
distance from our world, which provides distance and makes the reader more
receptive to poetic language—and poetic language is at the heart of TWHF.
Psyche
illustrates both the simplicity and complexity of faith, while Orual believes
in the gods, but is suspicious of their goodness. Her faith is transmitted
(rather than direct or experiential—I'm not sure this was part of the
argument). Orual is afraid, rather than rationally skeptical. She suffers from
“infinite misgivings,” but also has moments of tenderness or self-oblivion. The
palace scene minutely illustrates the “anatomy of doubt.”
Tixier also
compared Orual's sorrow to the narrator's (Lewis's?) in A Grief Observed. He wrote: “It is not my reason that is taking
away my faith; it is emotion.” Then she compared it to the short story “Light,”
which is a distillation of the same points about doubt and faith. Both have
misty uncertainty, a yearning for assurance, and emblems of sehnsucht
[visible light, the mountain, etc]. Both books have a mystical core. Lewis's
method of writing was often retrospective: remembering and reviewing past spiritual
steps.
TWHF uses
the genre of the “Complaint” and also draws from the book of Job. A complaint
is not blasphemy, but a way to faith. Charles Williams, Tixier pointed out,
admired Job. He wrote: “Job's impatience had been approved, his apparent
blasphemies accepted.” Orual is of Job's lineage. After her complaint is
uttered, she enters into silence. She is a Job-like figure for our time. God's
answer is not an answer, but a story. It also leads Orual into an Act of Exchange—Orual
carries Psyche's burden. The mystical moment is a revelation of plenitude and
simplicity. This is the climax of the narrative trajectory.
Tixier’s paper
was nice, but was not a scholarly analysis. It was an observation of a theme. This
frustrates me, because Lewis studies have been plagued by summary and thematic
papers for years, which I believe is one reason Lewis is not more respected by
mainstream academia. I passionately believe that we need to STOP presenting
these elementary observations and begin applying rigorous scholarship if any
good work is to be done on Lewis.
Then Maggie Goodman, a member of the Society, read Lewis’s poem
“The Late Passenger.”
Finally, Michael
Travers spoke on “Invitation to Glory: CSL's apologetic of hope.” He
recounted that Alister McGrath lists three reasons for the popularity of CSL's
apologetics: 1. logical positivism has declined; 2. his writings have religious
appeal; and 3. he appeals to the imagination. Travers wants to add another: his
apologetic writings include an invitation to hope for Glory. Ecclesiastes says
that God has put eternity into men's hearts. The Bible presents this hope in
narrative form: a grand narrative of the created order. CSL gives voice to this
Christian narrative of hope, inviting his readers home. Attempts to turn earth
into heaven dull our longing for the real thing.
His
narrative of creation is found in The Magician's Nephew. It echoes the
Biblical narrative.
We live in a condition of exile and hope: looking backwards
to Eden and forward to Heaven. That Hideous Strength as a narrative of
separation and “objectification.” The Silver Chair as classic quest
narrative. But even when the quest is accomplished, the longing remains: it is
a there-and-back-again narrative, but only back to a good earthly realm, not
(yet) to Heaven. Longing is most naturally expressed in literature through the
quest narrative (i.e., The Voyage of the Dawn Treader). {note:
this is nearly the only Inklings work in which the longing is located in the EAST;
everywhere else, good is to the WEST}. :) In The Great Divorce, this
longing is shown in the strength, brightness, and hardness of all things in
Heaven, to emphasize how much more real it is than earth.
All of
these themes are brought together in The Last Battle. {side note:
Obviously the Stable and the Wardrobe are Time Lord technology.} Travers
compared the end of The Last Battle with the book of Revelation, chapter
21, and concluded that all of Lewis’s works encourage his readers to long for
heaven and for God.
Again, this
was a nice talk, but was not a scholarly analysis. It really wanted to be a
sermon. Travers would have done better to go all the way and preach us an
inspiring sermon, rather than reading a somewhat dull paper without applying
scholarly rigor. We need to rescue Lewis from the burden of summary and
thematic appreciation under which his works have struggled for these fifty
years. On this anniversary, let us take a new approach. Let all conference
organizers, journal editors, and event planners in Lewisiana covenant together:
There shall be no more summary! We will only speak publicly about Lewis’s works
if we speak intelligently. We will use profound analysis. We will raise his
works to the level at which they belong: With the works of T.S. Eliot, or Tolkien,
who are appreciated by mainstream scholarship. We will not let him fall into
obscurity or into the grave of popularism. His popularity will take care of
itself: His academic reputation will not. Therefore, we eschew summaries and
fluffy appreciation from here onwards into the future. To another 50 years!
25 November 2013
Alliteration and Local Habitations: Meeting Malcolm Guite
There are few moments in your life when you meet someone so
curiously magnetic, so profoundly inspirational that you feel he or she has
stepped straight out of a time-cherished fairy tale.
So it was when I met Malcolm Guite.
Malcolm was one of the featured speakers at the C.S. Lewis
Foundation’s Fall Conference in Houston, Texas earlier this month. After a
delayed flight, Malcolm arrived tired but jovial with an emerald jacket,
burgundy vest, khaki trousers, and travel-stained wooden walking stick. I greeted
him with a firm hug. He and I had corresponded over the last few months, but
this was the first time that we had met face-to-face.
“To give to airy nothingness a local habitation and a name”
The following day Malcolm taught two courses for the
Writer’s Track sessions offered by the Foundation. In both sessions, Malcolm
shared poetry from his forthcoming release, The
Singing Bowl. He also shared his artistic wisdom with the crowd, who
gasped and furiously scribbled notes as he talked. Malcolm’s first session
concentrated on the art of incarnation – that we create because are products of
a prodigious Creator (what Tolkien called “sub-creation”). Ultimately, we
create to please God. What enormous yet joyous responsibility – and to such a
worthy audience!
So how do we set about creating? How do we of creative
impulse pluck an idea out of the air and stir the
dust of obscurity into something lovely and moving, like metaphorical Adams?
“Begin with you,” Malcolm suggests, “Start by thinking of
yourself as a made thing.” Creating is a
holy act, an act in which we take “a finite set of words” and make something
more. We take twenty-six letters and place them in various arrangements, and
meaning is born. As a creator we must be gentle with ourselves, forgiving,
reassuring – “Be as patient and generous and caring with your creatures
[writing] as God is with His Creation”. God
gives His character space and room to breathe. For example, Malcolm claims, God
looked to see what Adam would name the animals. In this way, we “share in the
joy of creation by creating”.
Malcolm works well with closed form poetry. His first book
of poetry, Sounding the Seasons, is a
sonnet sequence celebrating the liturgical year. He enjoys the structure and paradoxically,
it lends him the liberty to create within those limitations. In fact, Malcolm
states that it is important to know your creative limitations – “Figure out the
basic shapes of things and the limitations which it must work within”. He
compared this as “symmetry” versus “bounding energy”. True prudence is knowing,
acknowledging (and even appreciating) your limits. It establishes the proper
place for our work to begin, and continue, with beneficial structure. This is why Malcolm enjoys writing in iambic pentameter (as illustrated in the poem below).
As Malcolm explained, culture is reductive. In the
exhaustive search to satisfy our curiosity, much truth is explained away
without expressing awe about its mysterious splendor. Glory, he cites, is
translated as “weight”. Envision a scale: sorrow’s heaviness makes one pan
hopelessly sink. In reflecting God’s glory, in creating, we fill the opposing pan
with “the weight of glory” which lifts sorrow and achieves balance.
Therefore, by creating, we are alleviating sorrow and introducing an
aspect of God’s glory into the universe.
Malcolm explained similar themes in a short interview I
conducted with him on Saturday for the “All About Jack” podcast. To listen to
this enlightening exchange, visit here.
Photo courtesy of Amazon.com
Later that evening, I worked the Foundation bookstore,
operated by Books by Becka, and was fortunate enough to sell the first
stateside copies of The Singing Bowl.
Malcolm sang songs (he is also an accomplished musician) and enthusiastically signed copies of
his new book.
Malcolm signing my copy of The Singing Bowl
It is my firm belief that long after we have graduated to the idyllic landscape of Aslan’s Country, Malcolm’s poetry will continue to challenge and inspire generations to come. Below I have included the first poem of Malcolm’s collection. Here, Malcolm uses the singing bowl as a meditative symbol, a bowl which needs to be “empty” to “sing” properly. It is a poignant reflection which pleads for a deep sense of satisfaction, for calm and quiet. Like the movement at a bowl’s rim, the poem ends where it begins – with you, now, in your circumstances no matter how dark or inconvenient. Take what you have and “let it be for good”. Such wisdom expressed in exquisite language. The sheer beauty of the poem is worth the price of the collection.
Singing Bowl
Begin the song
exactly where you are.
Remain within the
world of which you’re made.
Call nothing common
in the earth or air.
Accept it all and let
it be for good.
Start with the very
breath you breathe in now,
This moment’s pulse,
this rhythm in your blood
And listen to it,
ringing soft and low.
Stay with the music,
words will come in time.
Slow down your breathing.
Keep it deep and low.
Become an open
singing bowl, whose chime
Is richness rising
out of emptiness,
And timelessness
resounding into time.
And when the heart is
full of quietness
Begin the song
exactly where you are.
Keep up with Malcolm on his blog: http://www.malcolmguite.com/
Follow Malcolm on Twitter @malcolmguite
Books by Becka is selling physical copies of The Singing Bowl. Visit her website to purchase one here. (They make EXCELLENT Christmas gifts!)
To purchase a digital version of The Singing Bowl, go here.
To purchase a digital version of The Singing Bowl, go here.
To purchase a digital version of Sounding the Seasons, go here
These can also be purchased through the UK publisher, Canterbury Press.
Don't forget - Malcolm has TWO albums available for purchase on his website and through iTunes: Dancing Through the Fire and The Green Man.
For more information on the C.S. Lewis Foundation and its events, please visit www.cslewis.org.
17 November 2013
PA Shakespeare Announces its 2014 summer season!
Pennsylvania Shakespeare Festival Announces 2014 Summer Season
Center Valley, PA
– The Pennsylvania Shakespeare Festival’s 23rd season
features Shakespeare’s Macbeth in
repertory with the inventive hit comedy Lend
Me a Tenor, the Bard’s romantic comedy The Two Gentlemen of Verona and
the beloved musical Fiddler
on the Roof. The season also includes Tina Packer’s masterful Women of Will, which will
launch a national tour following its run at PSF.
“The vibrant interaction between the artists and the audiences at PSF continues to be the centerpiece of a uniquely enriching experience for our patrons,” says Patrick Mulcahy, producing artistic director. “Record subscriptions are a great sign that it’s working.
“Expanded programming has lead to deeper engagement by giving our audiences more opportunities for pre- and post-show experiences.”
“The vibrant interaction between the artists and the audiences at PSF continues to be the centerpiece of a uniquely enriching experience for our patrons,” says Patrick Mulcahy, producing artistic director. “Record subscriptions are a great sign that it’s working.
“Expanded programming has lead to deeper engagement by giving our audiences more opportunities for pre- and post-show experiences.”
For the fourth consecutive season, PSF will produce two plays in repertory on
its main stage: Macbeth and Lend Me a Tenor. Mulcahy
returns to the director’s chair with Macbeth for
the first time since his triumphant production of Hamlet in 2011. “This
is a scorching personal and political nightmare made real – and I’m envisioning
a production that will appeal to multiple generations, as Shakespeare always
has and always will,” he says.
Lend Me a Tenor will
be directed by long-time Festival artist Jim Helsinger, who directed The Importance of Being Earnest last
season and also played the role of Lady Bracknell to rave reviews. “My favorite
description of the play is an accelerating snowball of laughter,” Mulcahy says.
“It has the class and charm of a Kaufman and Hart comedy plus all the
door-slamming hilarity of a Marx Brothers’ classic like Room Service. It’s a
masterwork of comic mayhem.”
Following his lauded production of Oklahoma! last
summer, PSF
Associate Artistic Director Dennis Razze will direct Fiddler on the Roof. “Fiddler on
the Roof is the great
American musical," Razze says. "The combined talents of Jerry Bock,
Sheldon Harnick, Joseph Stein, and Jerome Robbins all perfectly coalesced to
create this modern masterpiece based on Tevye
the Dairyman and other tales by Yiddish writer Sholem
Aleichem. Set in 1905 in Czarist Russia, this musical has been performed all
over the world and appreciated by people of every faith and culture. The
fiddler balanced precariously on the roof is a metaphor of survival, and of the
traditions and faith that help provide balance and direction in the upheaval of
challenging times.”
Best friends fall for the same girl in Shakespeare’s earliest romantic
comedy The Two Gentlemen
of Verona. A Duke, a debutante and a dog join the cast in this
lively exploration of loyalty and love. Matt Pfeiffer, director of last
season’s hit The 39 Steps,
returns to direct.
Funny and fierce, Women
of Will is the masterful summation of Tina’s Packer’s 40-plus
years investigating all things Shakespeare. Exploring themes of love, loss,
freedom, control, violence and power through the heroines in Shakespeare’s
text, Packer traces the chronological evolution of Shakespeare’s female
characters. Founding Artistic Director of the renowned Shakespeare &
Company, Tina Packer has won accolades from Ben Brantley of The New York Times for
this work. Starring Ms. Packer and Nigel Gore, Women of Will will be directed by Eric
Tucker.
The production runs July 20 through August 3 in the intimate Schubert Theatre,
and will launch a national tour. “Tina has been a force of nature in
Shakespeare performance in England and in America for decades,” says
Mulcahy. “Any understanding of Shakespeare’s women would be incomplete
without Women of Will.”
The 2014 season will also include two productions for children: Cinderella and Shakespeare for Kids. The
season opens May 30 and runs through August 3 in the Labuda Center for the
Performing Arts on the Center Valley campus of DeSales University.
Subscription renewals are available in mid-November; new subscriptions will be
available after January 1st.
The Pennsylvania Shakespeare Festival, a professional company in residence at
DeSales University, is the Official Shakespeare Festival of the Commonwealth
and a professional, not-for-profit theatre company. An independent 501 c 3
organization, PSF receives support from DeSales University and relies on
contributions from individuals, government agencies, corporations and
foundations. PSF is a constituent of the Theatre Communications Group (TCG),
the national organization for the American theatre, and a member of the Greater
Philadelphia Cultural Alliance, the Shakespeare Theatre Association, the Lehigh
Valley Arts Council, and Discover Lehigh Valley.
Season
Schedule:
Fiddler on
the Roof •
June 11 – June 29
Macbeth • July 17 – August 3
Lend Me a
Tenor •
July 9 – August 3
Shakespeare
for Kids •
July 23 – August 2
The Two
Gentlemen of Verona • June 18 – July 13
Women of
Will •
July 20 – August 3
Cinderella • May 30 – August 2
14 November 2013
Where is "The Hobbit"?
You are invited to attend
Lehigh Carbon Community College (LCCC)
is hosting an event in preparation for the release of
Peter Jackson’s film
The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug.
Everyone is
invited!
* When: Thursday, Dec. 5 at 6:00 p.m.
* Where: LCCC Main Campus, Science Hall (SH) 144.
* What: A lecture, discussion, & quiz game
about Tolkien’s Legendarium,
especially his imaginative geography.
* Extra credit may be available for LCCC students
* Extra credit may be available for LCCC students
(ask your professor).
* A suggested donation of $5 will help defray the cost of refreshments and the lecturer’s presentation.
For more information,
* A suggested donation of $5 will help defray the cost of refreshments and the lecturer’s presentation.
For more information,
please contact Sørina Higgins at shiggins@lccc.edu.
12 November 2013
5-Minute McGrath
I'm reviewing three new Lewis biographies for Sehnsucht: The C.S. Lewis Journal. Here are selections from my thoughts on the last of these.
Alister McGrath's book C. S. Lewis: A Life: Eccentric Genius, Reluctant Prophet is by far the most academic of the trio. Its style is objective and authoritative. Its content is extensive, covering public, private, personal, theological, and professional aspects of Lewis' life. There are a few noteworthy moments in this book that call for brief examination.
Alister McGrath's book C. S. Lewis: A Life: Eccentric Genius, Reluctant Prophet is by far the most academic of the trio. Its style is objective and authoritative. Its content is extensive, covering public, private, personal, theological, and professional aspects of Lewis' life. There are a few noteworthy moments in this book that call for brief examination.
First,
there is the much-discussed topic: McGrath provides a new chronology for Lewis' conversion. Many
Lewis scholars and fans have been weighing in on this topic online; a
google search for “McGrath Lewis conversion” will reveal
insightful, detailed discussions about the dates Lewis records (in
his letters, Surprised
by Joy,
and elsewhere), the dates McGrath offers, and evaluations of the two.
Here is one by The Pilgrim in Narnia that clearly explains the situation.
Second,
McGrath focuses a little more than other biographers have done on
Lewis' Irishness, discussing this topic heavily at the beginning of
his volume. He positions Lewis in historical context far more fully
than either of the others, discussing social class, politics,
economics, and war just enough to provide a robust understanding of
the world into which Lewis was born.
Third,
McGrath includes much material about Mrs. Moore and about Charles
Williams, analyzing each of these influences sufficiently.
His
approach to one episode has, however, generated criticism. McGrath is
very harsh towards Joy Davidman, Lewis' wife. He claims that Joy
purposefully set out to “seduce” Lewis (323). He refers to (but,
frustratingly, does not publish or quote from) “forty-five sonnets,
written by Davidman for Lewis over the period 1951-1954” (323).
Some of them, McGrath claims, “set out in great detail how Davidman
attempted to forge that relationship [with Lewis]. Lewis is
represented as a glacial figure, an iceberg that Davidman intends to
melt through a heady mixture of intellectual sophistication and
physical allure” (323). How strange, then, that McGrath does not
quote any lines at all from these poems to support his controversial
interpretation. Instead, he refers in his footnotes to Don King's
forthcoming study, Yet
One More Spring.
We will have to wait, then, to see how much evidence there is to
support McGrath's reading of Joy Davidman as a money-grubbing,
sexually motivated, American predator.
Even
more surprising than McGrath's negative interpretation of Davidman is
his failure to balance this ugly portrait with the image
of the woman who brought passionate, comforting, companionable love
to Lewis in his later years and the writer who inspired several of
his last, best books. Had she done nothing else, Joy's role as
midwife to Till
We Have Faces
alone would have earned her a place worthy of praise. Yet she did far
more.
Finally,
McGrath is also critical of one other character in this story: Lewis
himself. McGrath takes a refreshingly objective approach to the man
and his work. His is no wimpy paean of watery praise for St. Lewis.
Instead, he takes the philosopher and apologist seriously, analyzing
each of Lewis' arguments and pointing out their weak spots. This is
exactly what Lewis needed, and what he liked in his friends. He loved
a good argument. He would have been delighted to sit down with
McGrath and thrash out these points.
Perhaps
the most telling critique is his attack on the famous “trilemma”:
the Liar, Lunatic, or Lord proof about Christ's nature. I have long
thought that this lovely, elegant argument simply does not work as an
evangelical tool, because it functions on Christian
presuppositions—which are exactly what the listener presumably does
not
accept! McGrath takes the same approach, albeit much more thoroughly
and professionally than I have done. He points out: “the main
problem is that this argument does not work apologetically.
It may well make sense to some Christian readers.... Yet the inner
logic of this argument clearly presupposes a Christian framework of
reasoning” (227) and ignores several alternatives that
non-Christians may propose, such as “that Jesus was a well-loved
religious leader and martyr whose followers later came to see him as
divine” (227). One can imagine other possibilities, such as a
universe in which god lies, or in which there are so many gods that
anyone can truly claim godhead, or (the most plausible postmodern
option) a universe in which “truth” and “lies” have no
meaning-content.
In
short, McGrath's critiques of Lewis are good. They are necessary, in
a publishing world glutted with Jacksploitation and hagiography. They
are apt, opening cracks that should be further explored. And in spite
of his harsh treatment of Davidman and less-than-idolatrous treatment
of Lewis (or perhaps because of them), this is one of the most
intelligent biographies on the market.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)