King
Arthur Was an Elf!
An
Imaginary, Composite, Inklings Arthuriad
ABSTRACT:
The recent publication of
The Fall
of Arthur,
an unfinished poem by J.R.R. Tolkien, revealed a
startling, previously-unknown aspect of Tolkien’s legendarium. The
key is found in notes Tolkien left about how he intended the
fragmentary Fall of Arthur
to
continue (included in
Christopher Tolkien's editorial matter). In the final confrontation,
Mordred would fatally wound Arthur, Arthur would kill Mordred, and
Arthur would be carried away to the West for healing. Lancelot,
arriving too late, would set sail into the West, searching for his
king, never to return.
In
other words, Lancelot is Eärendel. He sails into the West, seeking a
lost paradise: Avalon, Tol Eressëa, or the Land of Faery. If Tolkien
had finished this poem, he could have woven it together with The
Silmarillion so that his
elvish history mapped onto the legends of Arthur, forming the
mythological and linguistic foundation on which “real” English
history and language were based. In addition, he could have
collaborated with Lewis and Williams on their Arthurian legends,
creating a totalizing myth greater than any they wrote individually.
This
paper, then, examines the theological, literary, historical and
linguistic implications of an imaginary, composite, Inklings
Arthuriad by comparing the Arthurian geography and characters of The
Fall of Arthur, The Silmarillion, and
The Lord of the Rings
with
“Lancelot,”
Perelandra,
and That Hideous
Strength by
C.S. Lewis and Taliessin
Through Logres and The
Region of the Summer Stars by
Charles Williams.
In
all three writers’ worlds, evil is in the East; this is not
surprising in an England threatened by Nazi Germany. God’s country
is in the opposite direction, across the sea, connected with ancient
legends about Hesperus, the evening star, Venus, the light in the
West.
In
all three writers' worlds, heroic characters achieve a great quest
and leave this earthly realm for a heavenly one, attaining a
spiritual fulfillment that has both historical and personal
implications for England and for the individual Christian.
If Tolkien had finished The
Fall of Arthur and
if the Inklings had put
all their Arthurian ideas together, they could have produced the kind
of totalizing English mythology that Tolkien attempted, but
abandoned. But he did not, so this paper also considers why he
stopped, and what the theoretical pitfalls are of examining a work of
literature that does not exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment